Legal Opinion

Hollingshead v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 2010No. WD 71775PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY D. WITT, Judge.

Timothy Hollingshead (“Hollingshead”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.0351 motion without an evidentia-ry hearing. For the reasons set forth herein, the cause is remanded to the motion court.

Factual Background

Hollingshead pled guilty to one count of murder in the second degree, Section 565.021,2 pursuant to a plea agreement in exchange for a “lid” of twenty-one years in prison.

In his plea colloquy before the trial court, Hollingshead acknowledged that he understood the terms of the agreement and that his possible maximum sentence was twenty-one years. He…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barry v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Bowens v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Gaddis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Burston v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Gerlt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Anthony F. Johnson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Frye v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Atchison v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API