Legal Opinion
Luse v. Fort Worth Electric & Motor Car Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 16, 1924No. 7130PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The Fort Worth Electric & pMotor Oar Company is a trade-name used by G. C. Tippins and W. L. Corn, who were partners. It appears from the record that on March 18,1918, Tippins and Corn, as partners, recovered a judgment against A. F. Luse, and on October 31, 1921, procured' issuance of writ of garnishment to the Continental National 'Bank of Fort Worth, which was alleged to be indebted to Liise. The bank answered as garnishee, this answer was controverted by the garnisher, who - filed a supplemental application, and Luse, the debt or, replevied the impounded funds, intervened in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frank v. TatumTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Willis v. Lyman, Sears & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1858
- Martin v. HemphillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Scurlock & Rutledge v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
- Smith Brothers v. Wallis, Landes Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Munday v. GuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Peerless Oil & Gas Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- First National Bank of Fabens v. Pacific Cotton AgencyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Subscribers to Fidelity Lloyds of America v. LydayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Ray v. Peter Fox Sons Co. of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.