Vogler v. Charles Ingrao
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Appellant recovered judgment against defendant Karsten on the demand note of the latter made in favor of one Josephine Falzone, but was denied recovery as to all others. *
Defendants Florence Karsten and Catherine Ingrao are sisters and for some time prior to December, 1946, had, as a copartnership, operated the Venetian Dining Room and Gardens in Altadena. On January 25, 1947, Florence executed and delivered the note to Miss Falzone in the principal sum of $2,400 with interest and signed the name of the partnership by Florence L. Karsten, Partner. The court found that no partnership of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- American National Bank v. DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Supreme Grand Lodge of Ancient & Mystical Order Rosae Crucis v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Torvend v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tsakos Shipping & Trading, S.A. v. Juniper Garden Town Homes, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Credit Bureaus of Merced County, Inc. v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Epley v. HillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954