Legal Opinion

St. Peter v. Ploneer Theatre Corp.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 2, 1940No. 45100PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This controversy involves a drawing at a threatre under an arrangement designated at “bank night”, not identical with, but substantially similar to the arrangement involved in the controversy heretofore presented to this court by the case of State v. Hundling, 220 Iowa 1369, 264 N. W. 608, 103 A. L. R. 861. In that case, we held that the arrangement was not a lottery in violation of the provisions of section 13218 of the Code 1931, and that the proprietor of the theatre was not subject to criminal prosecution. In this case, we are confronted with the question whether the arrangement is such…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Breen v. MayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. State v. HundlingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  3. Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  4. Harlan v. HarlanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Baker v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1873

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Magnusson Agency v. Public Entity National Co.-MidwestSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  2. Anderson v. Douglas & Lomason Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  3. State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In Re Lindsey's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  5. State v. KhalsaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API