Legal Opinion
State v. Hundling
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided January 21, 1936No. 43219PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
— The defendant, who was manager and part owner of a motion picture theater at Newton, was convicted of advertising a scheme for a lottery known as “bank night”, in violation of the provisions of section 13218, Code 1931. The advertising consisted of the distribution of handbills announcing that a prize of $50 would be given away at the theater on the following Thursday night to the person whose name was drawn if claimed within two and one-half minutes. It advised that the drawing would be from names appearing in a registration book kept by the theater for that purpose and in which every one…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yellow-Stone Kit v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Maughs v. PorterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Cross v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Post Pub. Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1916
- R. J. Williams Furniture Co. v. McComb Chamber of CommerceMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Commonwealth v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- State ex rel. Beck v. Fox Kansas Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Affiliated Enterprises, Inc. v. WallerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Cowie v. La Crosse Theaters Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.