Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Boucher

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 16, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action to recover for goods sold and delivered, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County and tried to the court, Coats, J. ; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $129, and appeal by the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

The defendant was described in the writ as “Mrs.-Bushy, a widow, of the town' of West Hartford.” George G. Sill, as an executor, was made garnishee, and was also cited to appear in-court and disclose. The defendant pleaded in abatement the omission of her Christian name, and the citing in of the executor as garnishee ; and the court having sustained the demurrer to the plea in abatement, the writ was amended with defendant’s consent so as to correctly state her .name.

The complaint, dated August 16th, 1900, contained the common counts. The first item of the bill of particulars under date of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. New York & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Warner v. LanciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Dorsey v. HoneymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. Hoggson & Pettis Manufacturing Co. v. SearsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  4. Schoolhouse Corp. v. WoodConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Clemens v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API