Legal Opinion

Frederick v. Ludwig

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 13, 1925No. 15734PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.. The parties will be designated as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff declared upon two promissory notes. One in the principal sum of $484.51 upon which a balance of $273.34 remained due and carried 10 per cent, interest and attorney’s fees, and was executed by both defendants. The second note was for the principal sum of $80.83, upon which there had been paid the sum of $35, leaving a balance due, including interest, of $48.48 plus attorney’s' fees. This note was executed by Lewis Frederick, and plaintiff prays judgment against both defendants .in the sum of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. BodovitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Farwell v. EnsignMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Sutton v. SuttonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
  5. Bush v. TilleyNew York Supreme Court · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Wayne Tank & Pump Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Strickland v. HetheringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Badger v. DukesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Templeman v. Wilson Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API