Legal Opinion
Farwell v. Ensign
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 7, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Error to superior court of Detroit. (Chipman, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtOhampliN, J.
This case comes before us upon a written finding of facts and conclusions of law made by the judge of the superior court, and bill of exceptions.
The findings of fact and of law are as follows:
“1. The defendant the Excelsior Electric Company is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Michigan, and in October, 1883, its capital stock was divided into 4,000 shares, of which 1,000 shares were owned by plaintiff Farwell, 1,600 shares by plaintiff Field, 400-shares by one Van Vliet, 400 shares each by defendants Beniteau and *601Ensign, and 200 shares by various parties. Said Yan Yliet…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Good v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Rey v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Kelly v. . BurroughsNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Barry v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- McCune v. BeltSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kulenkamp v. GroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Borden v. Fletcher's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Brown v. SmedleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Frederick v. LudwigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Jackson National Life Insurance v. BakaianMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.