Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1952No. Civ. 18979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment awarding him $2,734.27, with interest, in an action against his coadventurer seeking monies due under a contract. The joint venture was unsuccessful, and the amount awarded plaintiff represents his share of the distributable proceeds after deduction of the loss sustained.

On November 12, 1947, plaintiff and defendant Marshall Adams Smith entered into a written contract to construct a house upon land owned by defendant, which, upon completion, was to be sold and the profits shared equally between them. Plaintiff, a contractor, was to supervise and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Campagna v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Griggs v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Irer v. GawnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Parker v. TrefryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Fitzgerald v. ProvinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kovacik v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Danelian v. McLoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Security Pacific National Bank v. MatekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Wall v. SiegelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API