Charron v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtJeffords, J.
This is an action of tort. The verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff, and the case is here on exceptions by the defendant.
The defendant moved for a directed verdict upon several grounds, one only of which need be considered. This ground was that taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff she has failed to show that the defendant or its agents were guilty of any acts of negligence which were a proximate cause of her injury. The lower court denied the motion with exceptions to the defendant.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff the jury could…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Railway Co. v. LawtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
- Griswold v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Seabord Air-Line Railway v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lavallee v. PrattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Terrill v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948
- Shimp v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Boyd v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Lavallee v. PrattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.