Alliance for Clean Coal v. Bayh
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Entry Regarding Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Defendants’ Motion to Abstain and the Parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment
TINDER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on multiple motions. First, Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs case for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Second, Defendants move the court to abstain from proceeding further in this case under the doctrine set forth in Burford v. Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315, 63 S.Ct. 1098, 87 L.Ed. 1424 (1943), or the doctrine stated in…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Back v. CarterDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
- General Motors Corp. v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1999
- Smith v. Indianapolis Public SchoolsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
- Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. PSI Energy, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.