Legal Opinion
Smith v. Indianapolis Public Schools
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided November 30, 1995No. IP95-183C B/SPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY
BARKER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Constance E. Smith (“Plaintiff’) has brought an Amended Complaint against Indianapolis Public Schools (“Defendant” or “IPS”) for its alleged failure to provide Plaintiffs children with a free appropriate public education in violation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. 1 This matter is currently before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), on the grounds that this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear the claim because Plaintiff has…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- W.B. v. MatulaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Capitol Leasing Company v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Annamma A. Ezekiel and Al Ezekiel v. Jaime T. Michel and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Grafon Corporation v. Elmer P. Hausermann and Marten C. HausermannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Diatta v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- J.H.R. v. Board of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- L.M. Ex Rel. Mauser v. Brownsburg Community School Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
- Dible v. City of LafayetteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- VanDenBerg Ex Rel. VanDenBerg v. Appleton Area School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003