Johnson v. United States
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO STRIKE, AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
BARKER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (the “FTCA”), seeking to recover for damages sustained to their home and property during the execution of an arrest warrant on a third party through the coordinated efforts of various law enforcement officials. This matter comes before the Court on: 1) Defendant United States’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) or…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Capitol Leasing Company v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Annamma A. Ezekiel and Al Ezekiel v. Jaime T. Michel and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Bruce Crawford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rosario v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
- Wojciechowicz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
- Smith Ex Rel. Fitzsimmons v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2007
- Rivera-Quinones v. Rivera-GonzalezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
- Four v. US Ex Rel. Bureau of Indian AffairsDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.