Legal Opinion

Klinger v. Peterson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1971No. 1218, 1220PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

This case concerns the exercise of an option, contained in a lease agreement and its supplements, to purchase certain real property. There is also presented a question of whether, before the attempted exercise of the option to purchase, the lease was terminated, thereby preventing the option from being invoked.

Melvin W. Peterson and Ruth G. Peterson, hereafter called lessors, are the owners of commercial real property situated at the corner of Lake Otis Road and Northern Lights Boulevard in Anchorage, Alaska. The building on the property was original ly a grocery store,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chaude v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Pettit v. TourisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Hindu Incense Manufacturing Co. v. MacKenzieIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Central Trust Co. v. WolfMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Denver Plastics, Inc. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Amoco Oil Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  2. Wright v. VickaryousAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re Waterkist Corporation, Debtor. City of Valdez, Alaska v. Waterkist CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Dillingham Commercial Co., Inc. v. SpearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Klosterman v. Hickel Investment Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API