Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Arnett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1991No. OBAD No. 989, SCBD No. 3710PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Respondent lawyer was accused by complainant of professional misconduct sufficient to warrant disciplinary proceedings. The parties entered Proposed Stipulations of Fact and Conclusions of Law but disagreed on the appropriate discipline. The following stipulations were adopted by the Trial Panel of the Professional Responsibility Tribunal:

In the early morning hours of October 14, 1989, respondent was arrested after a twenty-minute car chase through the northwest Oklahoma City area during which speeds exceeded 80 miles per hour. Respondent received numerous traffic citations which were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API