Legal Opinion

Bakker v. Thunder Spring-Wareham, LLC

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2005No. 30383PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice Pro Tern.

This is a dispute concerning the payment to an individual of a commission for marketing condominiums. On a motion for summary judgment, the district court found in favor of the employer, Thunder Spring, holding that the employee had to be employed at close of escrow for the commission to be payable. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Shannon R. Bakker (Bakker) was employed by Thunder Spring-Wareham, LLC (Thunder Spring), as an on-site sales agent, marketing units at a private resort in Sun Valley. A written contract established the terms of the employment.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Idaho First National Bank v. Bliss Valley Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Metcalf v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Stearns v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Idaho Power Co. v. Cogeneration, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Potlatch Education Ass'n v. Potlatch School District No. 285Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Esser Electric v. Lost River Ballistics Technologies, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Commercial Ventures, Inc. v. Rex M. & Lynn Lea Family TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Weisel v. BEAVER SPRINGS OWNERS ASS'N, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API