Legal Opinion
Chao v. Akron Insulation & Supply, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 9, 2006No. 05-3647UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal arises from an' action filed by the Secretary of Labor under Section 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 217, seeking to enjoin defendants Akron Insulation and its president and sole owner, Diño L. Lombardi, from violating the overtime pay and recordkeeping provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, and from withholding back wages due. See 29 U.S.C. §§ 207, 211(c), 215(a)(2) and 215(a)(5). The issues involve the question of payment for “shop time” and travel time of employees. After a one-day bench trial, the district court granted judgment in favor of the Secretary,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States Department of Labor v. Cole Enterprises, Inc., and William C. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jordan v. IBP, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2008
- Chao v. Westside Drywall, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
- Abadeer v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Bernal v. Trueblue, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- Morrison v. Columbus Family Health Care LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.