Legal Opinion
Atkinson v. Roth
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 6, 1961No. Nos. 13549-13555PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
These appeals are from judgments entered against the plaintiffs following the *572return by a jury of answers to special interrogatories,1 with no general verdict.
Seven actions were instituted in the court below stating claims arising out of a collision between an automobile driven by one Atkinson and a tractor-trailer driven by one Roth. Atkinson had five passengers in his vehicle. There is no dispute that he and three of his passengers were injured, and two of his passengers died, in the accident. Separate actions were commenced by or on behalf of three passengers…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eric McNello v. John B. Kelly, Inc. v. B. J. Lucarelli and Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Crane v. NealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- O'Malley v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- DeAngelis v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Holstein v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Edward C. Smith v. Borough of WilkinsburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Albert Junior HolleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Hewlett v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Townsend v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Jacobs v. TenneyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.