Legal Opinion

Holstein v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1943No. Appeals, 92-95PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Plaintiffs, Harry O. Holstein and Blanche E. Holstein, his wife, instituted these actions in trespass, in their own right and the former as guardian of their minor daughter, Harriet Holstein, against defendants, Kroger Grocery & Baking Company and Richard F. Ehrler, to recover compensation for personal injuries and property damage sustained in a motor vehicle collision. The jury returned verdicts against both defendants. The learned court below refused defendants’ motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial, and from the judgments entered on the verdicts, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Pittsburgh Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. O'Malley v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Felo v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. FennerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Atkinson v. RothCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  3. De Vito v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1951
  4. Koller v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Rodgers v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API