United States v. Albert Junior Holley
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:
In this bank robbery appeal we are concerned once again with the possibility of mistake and conviction of an innocent person inherent in the one-on-one positive identification rule. It is now settled beyond argument that the identification of a criminal actor by one person is itself evidence sufficient to go to the jury and support a guilty verdict and that application of this rule is not so fundamentally unfair as to be per se a denial of due process. Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972); Stanley v. Cox, 486 F.2d 48 (4th Cir. 1973); United…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Commonwealth v. BowdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- United States v. Louis C. Andrus, George E. Collett, William J. Lutson, Billy Ray Whittington, and Larry Thomas WhittingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Duke v. Uniroyal Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.