Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert Junior Holley

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1974No. 73-2299PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:

In this bank robbery appeal we are concerned once again with the possibility of mistake and conviction of an innocent person inherent in the one-on-one positive identification rule. It is now settled beyond argument that the identification of a criminal actor by one person is itself evidence sufficient to go to the jury and support a guilty verdict and that application of this rule is not so fundamentally unfair as to be per se a denial of due process. Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972); Stanley v. Cox, 486 F.2d 48 (4th Cir. 1973); United…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. BowdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. United States v. Louis C. Andrus, George E. Collett, William J. Lutson, Billy Ray Whittington, and Larry Thomas WhittingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Duke v. Uniroyal Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API