Legal Opinion
Walling v. Peacock Corporation
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 23, 1943No. Civil Action 689PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks an injunction to restrain the defendant from violating the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.
The defendant is engaged in buying, storing, selling, and dealing in onion sets and its office and plant is located adjacent t'o a sidetrack of the Chicago and North Shore Railroad at Berryville in a rural section of Kenosha County, Wisconsin. Selling both at wholesale and retail, its business has been national in scope. Most onion sets are sold from January 15 to April 15 in each year for spring…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bowie v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Fleming v. Hawkeye Pearl Button Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Missel v. Overnight Motor Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Bumpus v. Continental Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Waialua Agr. Co. v. ManejaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1951
- Waialua Agricultural Co., Limited v. ManejaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Wyatt v. Holtville Alfalfa Mills, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1952
- McComb v. Del ValleDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1948
- McComb v. Puerto Rico Tobacco Marketing Co-op. Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.