Legal Opinion
Small v. Heywood-Wakefield Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 2, 1936No. 3973PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLELLAN, District Judge.
This is a suit by the patentee of United States letters patent No. 1,826,532, for alleged infringement.
While an attempt is made to separate findings of fact from conclusions of law, all statements of fact wherever they appear are intended as findings of fact and all legal conclusions as conclusions of law, under the equity rules.
The issues include the validity of the patent, the defendant’s contention that it is entitled to a conveyance of the patent, and that at least it has a shop right therein. The infringement of claim 7 of the patent in suit is stipulated, and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- McCLURG v. KINGSLANDSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Heywood-Wakefield Co. v. SmallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
- Davis Harvester Co. v. Long Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966
- Strang v. CollyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- McNamara v. PowellNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Small v. Heywood-Wakefield Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.