McNamara v. Powell
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
Any attempt to review the evidence in detail would make this memorandum too long, and it would be of no benefit to the parties.
*807After a careful review of the evidence and a thoughtful study of the most excellent briefs submitted by both plaintiff and defendants, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has established by a fair preponderance of the evidence that for some time prior to May, 1927, a confidential relationship existed between the plaintiff and the defendant Powell; that in or about May, 1927, the plaintiff conceived the idea for a new type of muffler, and that on or about May 27, 1927,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cowee v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- L. P. Larson, Jr., Co. v. Wm. Wrigley, Jr., Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- Small v. Heywood-Wakefield Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936
- Bacon v. ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Nilsson v. De HavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dysart v. Remington Rand, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1941
- McNamara v. Powell Muffler Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1941
- Cahill v. ReganNew York Supreme Court · 1956