Legal Opinion
Feuerverger v. Hobart Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 5, 1990No. 89 CV 3649PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
BARTELS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Paul Feuerverger (“Feuerver-ger”) brought this suit to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained while he was feeding vegetables into a commercial food mixer manufactured by the defendant Hobart Corporation (“Hobart”). At the time of the accident Feuer-verger was employed by River Manor Health Related Facilities (“River Manor”), the Third-Party Defendant in this action. The complaint 1 makes claims in negligence and strict products liability alleging both defective design and manufacture. Hobart’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sperry v. Bauermeister, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992
- In Re Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Miller v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1992
- Welch v. Dura-Wound, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1995