Legal Opinion
In Re Asbestos Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 5, 1997No. 87 Civ. 8085(RWS), 90 Civ. 3473(RWS) and 92 Civ. 3901(RWS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, Senior District Judge.
Defendant Raymark Industries, Inc. (“Raymark”) has brought a trio of post-trial motions in response to a jury verdict entered in favor of three plaintiffs in these consolidated asbestos actions. First, Raymark has moved for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Rule 50(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., or in the alternative, grant of a new trial, pursuant to Rule 59(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., as against Helen Greff, Ann McPadden, and Rosalie Ciletti, plaintiffs in this asbestos litigation, (collectively “Plaintiffs”). Second, Raymark has moved for amendment of the judgment,…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Richard Samuels v. Air Transport Local 504Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Samuel S. SONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IVES LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Denny v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Katt v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- In Re Joint Eastern and Southern Dist. AsbestosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.