Legal Opinion
United States v. Jeromey Clay Parker, United States of America v. Phillip Allen Potter
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 11, 1993No. 92-3512, 92-3516PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Jeromey Clay Parker and Phillip Allen Potter were convicted of offenses connected with a murder-for-hire scheme. On appeal, they claim the district court 1 erred by denying their motion to dismiss pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 5032 and by increasing their offense level on the ground that their victim sustained serious bodily injury. Potter also claims his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses was violated when the district court admitted hearsay evidence at his sentencing hearing. Parker claims the district court erred by increasing his offense level for more than…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. James Michael WiseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Jeromey Clay Parker, United States of America v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Douglas Greg Cornelius, United States of America v. Douglas Greg CorneliusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Juvenile Male, (dist.ct. No. 90-0012m-01), United States of America v. Juvenile Male, (dist.ct. No. 90-0013m-01)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. William E. "Jack" StreetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Patrick ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- State v. McCrackenNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- United States v. Willie J. IveryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Marques D. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.