Legal Opinion

State v. Childers

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1986No. 856SC943PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Both defendants bring forward several assignments of error relating to the conduct of the trial. Since each defendant has raised different issues on appeal, we will address their appeals separately. We find no prejudicial error as to either defendant.

I

The Evidence

The State offered evidence tending to show that defendant Thompson owned and operated Sun Exterminating Company and that defendant Childers was employed as a salesman for the company. On 24 May 1984, defendants went to the home of Tommy Peel. Defendant Childers offered Mr. Peel a free termite inspection and defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. BlackstockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. RinckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. NajewiczCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. LedwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. HolanekCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  4. State v. AlmondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API