Legal Opinion

State v. Najewicz

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1993No. 9214SC5PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of one count of first degree rape. He contends the trial court erred by: (1) prohibiting questioning of the prosecuting witness regarding whether she had ever previously claimed to have been raped or sexually harassed; (2) allowing the prosecution to impeach his trial testimony with a transcript of his testimony from an in camera hearing conducted pursuant to N.C.R. Evid. 412; (3) failing to make inquiry of the jury as to whether it had prematurely begun deliberations; (4) not allowing a defense witness to answer whether defendant was “capable of raping…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. BanksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. BidgoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. O'HANLANCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. WithersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API