Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Bowles
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided November 27, 1944No. 81PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Judge.
Since 1941 Stanley W. Taylor has been the owner and operator of an apartment building in San Francisco, California, with about fifty apartments rented to tenants on a month-to-month basis. As such, he became subject to Maximum Rent Regulation No. 28 for the San Francisco Bay Defense-Rental Area, effective July 1, 1942.1 For housing accommodations rented on March 1, 1942, the regulation, as a general rule, fixes the rent prevailing on that date as the maximum legal rent.
On December 8, 1942, Taylor filed with the Area Rent Director a petition asking for a certificate authorizing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Taylor v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Wilson v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rivera v. R. Cobian Chinea & Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
- Woods v. DurrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Latoni v. Corte Municipal de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
- Woods v. DurrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Rivera Santiago v. R. Cobián Chinea & Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.