Legal Opinion
BMO Bank N.A. v. Bring Transport Inc, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 10, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00809Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 BMO BANK N.A., Case No. 1:24-cv-00809-KES-EPG 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 11 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED, IN PART 12 BRING TRANSPORT INC, et al., (ECF No. 32) 13 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 14 FOURTEEN DAYS 15 16 Plaintiff BMO Bank N.A. moves for default judgment against Defendants Bring Transport 17 Inc (Transport) and Gurpreet Singh Bring (Bring) on state law breach of contract claims. The 18 matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.