Greene v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
From a judgment of nonsuit plaintiff, guardian ad litem of the minor children of Leroy Davis, deceased, appeals on a settled statement.
Questions Presented
1. Was there any evidence which would have supported a finding of negligence of defendant?
2. Should the court have reopened the case to permit additional testimony as to the train’s stopping distance ?
Facts
At Pittsburg, California, defendant’s right of way runs in an east-west direction. There are siding tracks on either side of the right of way and between them a track for eastbound and one for westbound trains. Eastbound trains approach…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ShoemakerTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Puckhaber v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Koster v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Ross v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gigliotti v. NunesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Huang v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Hilyar v. Union Ice Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Consolidated World Investments, Inc. v. Lido Preferred Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- S. C. Anderson, Inc. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.