Legal Opinion

Smith v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 16, 1970No. 1 CA-IC 293PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Judge.

The petitioner was an employee of the Safeway Stores and, in the course and scope of her employment, she injured her left heel. Sometime later, and well within the year following the industrially related accident, she filed her claim with The Industrial Commission. Shortly thereafter and on 13 October 1967, the Commission addressed a communication to The Travelers Insurance Company. This communication was entitled “Notice of Injury and Acceptance of Liability.” It set forth the date and place of the injury as well as the name of the petitioner. There is an affidavit in the file…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Phoenix Metals Corporation v. RothArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Talley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Goodman v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Benites v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blickenstaff v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Edmunds v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. Korens v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. Columbia Group, Inc. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API