Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Baldwin Locomotive Works

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1929No. Appeal 339PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Appellant states the question involved as follows: “In a Workmen’s Compensation case, did the accident occur on the premises of the defendant, or were the injuries received away from the actual place of employment during a deviation or departure so wholly foreign to the employee’s duties as to amount to an abandonment of employment ? ’ ’ The referee found that the accident occurred on the premises while the employe was in the course of his employment; and the board and the court below affirmed the awards made to the widow and children.

As it is not disputed that the injury…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Flucker v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Meucci v. Gallatin Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Palko v. Taylor-Mccoy C. C. Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Giallonardo v. St. Joseph's CollegeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Dicicco v. Downs Carpet Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Wiles v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Moody v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API