Legal Opinion

Moody v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1932No. Appeal 251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The controlling question in this compensation case is: Did the fatal accident occur in the course of the deceased’s employment? The referee found that the deceased met his death on October 30, 1930, while in the course of his employment, and allowed compensation; the board and the court below affirmed the award.

Moody, the deceased husband of the claimant, and MolesHe were contract miners employed in the No. 9 vein in the Eiehards Colliery of the defendant company, and were the only workmen in that section of the mine. For about a month prior to their death, they had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Shoffler v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Hunter v. American Steel & Wire Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Adams v. Colonial Colliery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Franks v. Point Marion Bridge Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Haywood v. Henrietta Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API