Legal Opinion

Potts v. Barrett Div., Allied Chemical & Dye Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 4, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Goldmann, S. J. A. D.

Defendants Barrett Division of the Allied Chemical & Dye Corporation, and its insurer, The Travelers Insurance Company, appeal from a determination and order of the Division of Employment Security, Disability Insurance Service, in the Department of Labor and Industry, granting plaintiff Potts disability benefits under the Private Plan section of the Temporary Disability Benefits Law, N. J. S. A. 43:21-25 et seq.

Travelers had in October 1952 issued a policy under the Private Plan section (N. J. S. A. 43:21-32 to 36) covering Barrett…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ritter v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Whitfield v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Elwood v. New England Mut. L. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. RiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
  2. Iorio v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. OF EMP. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. SPECIAL CARE v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  4. Brinkerhoff v. CNA InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API