Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Rice

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1944No. 27,938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShake, J.

In 1936 the appellant issued to the appellee a policy of life insurance, providing, also, for the payment of certain disability benefits to the insured if he should “sustain a physical impairment such as . . . the permanent loss of the sight of both eyes.” The appellee sued on the policy, alleging that in 1941 he sustained “the complete and irrecoverable loss of the sight of both eyes.” Appellant answered that appellee’s disability was the direct and proximate result of his attempt to commit self-destruction when he was of sound mind. A demurrer to the answer was sustained and the appellant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ritter v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Hogston v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Box v. LanierTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Weeks v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AlawayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. Wischmeyer v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1989
  3. State v. WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Com. v. J. Irland Smith and Wesson 9MM Semi-Automatic Pistol, Serial PDW0493Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Commonwealth Life Insurance Co. v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API