Legal Opinion
Martin v. Brunzelle
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 7, 1988No. 87 C 8533PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Lestine Martin (“Martin”) has sued Jim Brunzelle (“Brunzelle”), asserting Brun-zelle’s refusal to rent or show her an apartment constituted racial discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1982 and 3604. Brunzelle in turn has sued State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”), seeking a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 that State Farm is obligated to defend and indemnify him pursuant to State Farm’s insurance policy.
Both Brunzelle and State Farm have now moved for summary judgment under Fed. R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56. For the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States Fire Insurance v. SchnackenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Conway v. Country Casualty Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Pipefitters Welfare Educational Fund v. Westchester Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Pipefitters Welfare Educational Fund v. Westchester Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Piper Jaffray Companies, Inc. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Red Ball Leasing, Inc. And American Red Ball Transit Company, Inc. v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Legarra v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.