Legal Opinion

McKay v. Farmers & Stockmens Bank of Clayton

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1978No. 3146PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LOPEZ, Judge.

Appellants (the McKays) brought suit to recover monetary damages for tortious and wrongful acceleration of secured promissory notes held by the appellees, Farmers and Stockmens Bank of Clayton, et al. (the Bank). The Bank moved for summary judgment and their motion was granted. The McKays appeal and we reverse.

Appellants present one issue for reversal: that the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment because a material question of fact exists as to whether or not the Bank’s foreclosure of appellants’ secured promissory notes was in good faith.

Fa…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Pharmaseal Laboratories, Inc. v. GoffeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Fort Knox National Bank v. GustafsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  4. Zengerle v. Commonwealth Insurance Co. of New YorkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Van Horn v. Van De Wol, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Smith v. PRICE'S CREAMERIES, DIV., ETC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Rigby Corp. v. Boatmen's Bank and Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Prairie State Bank v. HoefgenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  5. J.R. Hale Contracting Co. v. United New Mexico BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API