J.R. Hale Contracting Co. v. United New Mexico Bank
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
This suit involves the claimed wrongful acceleration of a $400,000 promissory note given by J.R. Hale Contracting Company (the company) to the United New Mexico Bank at Albuquerque. At a trial on the merits the district court granted the bank’s motion for a directed verdict, finding that the acceleration was justified because an interest payment was twenty-three days past due when the decision to accelerate was made. The company appeals and we reverse, holding that a factual question exists on whether the bank is estopped from using the default clause in the contract in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Shaeffer v. KeltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Clovis National Bank v. ThomasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- FARMERS CO-OP. EL., INC., DUNCOMBE v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Jackson National Life Insurance v. RececoniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Glenfed Financial v. Penick Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Brown v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Cafeteria Operators, L.P. v. Coronado-Santa Fe AssociatesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.