Legal Opinion

J.R. Hale Contracting Co. v. United New Mexico Bank

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1990No. 17889PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANSOM, Justice.

This suit involves the claimed wrongful acceleration of a $400,000 promissory note given by J.R. Hale Contracting Company (the company) to the United New Mexico Bank at Albuquerque. At a trial on the merits the district court granted the bank’s motion for a directed verdict, finding that the acceleration was justified because an interest payment was twenty-three days past due when the decision to accelerate was made. The company appeals and we reverse, holding that a factual question exists on whether the bank is estopped from using the default clause in the contract in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Shaeffer v. KeltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Clovis National Bank v. ThomasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. FARMERS CO-OP. EL., INC., DUNCOMBE v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Jackson National Life Insurance v. RececoniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Glenfed Financial v. Penick Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  4. Brown v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Cafeteria Operators, L.P. v. Coronado-Santa Fe AssociatesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API