Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Workman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 27, 2009No. 06-5179, 07-7034, 07-7056PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge,
joined by
HENRY, Chief Judge, and KELLY, LUCERO, MURPHY, HARTZ, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.
This court granted rehearing en banc to determine whether to accord deference to decisions of the Oklahoma state courts on claims of ineffective assistance of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 where those claims are based on evidence that was not part of the original trial court record and where the state court declined to supplement the record with the proffered evidence, based on Oklahoma Appellate Rule 3.11(B)(3)(b). Under Oklahoma procedure, appellate review of a criminal…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Rice v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Rimbert v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- State v. Timothy Alan DunlapIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Fairchild v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Winston v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.