Legal Opinion
Hemstreet v. Burroughs Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 7, 1987No. 81 C 6412PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM T. HART, District Judge.
Plaintiff Harold S. Hemstreet brings this action against defendants Burroughs Corporation and Harris Trust & Savings Bank, for patent infringement. Plaintiff is the owner of United States Patents Nos. 3,713,-099 (’099 patent) and 3,713,100 (’100 patent). Both patents have the same title: “Method and Apparatus For Identifying Letters, Characters, Symbols, and the Like.” The patents deal generally with character recognition. Defendant Burroughs manufactures a wide range of business equipment. Plaintiff alleges that all of the products…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Donna Reilly, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Harold S. Hemstreet v. Spiegel, Inc., Recognition Equipment IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- James Earl Renaud v. Martin Marietta Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Foseco International Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.