Legal Opinion
Washburn Storage Co. v. General Motors Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 9, 1954No. 35156PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
A motion is made to dismiss the bill of exceptions on two grounds. The first is as follows: Because no party was named therein as defendant in error, and further the acknowledgment of service by counsel for the manufacturer and the dealer did not purport to acknowledge service for any particular person, firm, or corporation.
Where the parties defendant are ascertainable from the caption of the bill of exceptions or the record, the bill of exceptions will not be dismissed for a failure to name specifically the parties defendant. Webb & Martin v. Anderson McGriff Hardware Co., 188 Ga. 291 (3 S.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- King Hardware Co. v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Moore v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Hulsey v. Interstate Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Simmons Company v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Wilkinson v. Rich's Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- The Flintkote Company v. Dravo Corporation, Diamond Manufacturing Company, Inc. And B. F. Diamond Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Long v. Jim Letts Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Mrs. Lois B. Nevels v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- General Motors Corp. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Ford Motor Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.