Crowl v. Ross
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The facts out of which this cause grew are substantially as follows:
W. X. Ross was in the mercantile business, and R. H. Spoon and E. W. Oglesby, desiring to obtain credit at Ross’s store, made and delivered to him their promissory note in the sum of $250, with the understanding that they should obtain merchandise from time to time until the total amount reached the value of $250, and to secure the payment of the note they executed their chattel mortgage covering — •
“Thirty acres of cotton located on W. J. McCauley’s farm,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Bristow v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Mitchell v. Guaranty State Bank of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Pioneer Tel. Tel. Co. v. Davis, Admr.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Smith v. LaFayette & Bro.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Chase v. Cable Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martin v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Aikins v. HuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Black, Sivalls & Bryson v. LoofbourrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Birchfield v. EedsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950