Chase v. Cable Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Tulsa County; J. W. Woodford, Judge. Replevin by the Cable.' Company against A. L. Chase. Verdict for plaintiff, motion for new trial overruled, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.
The Cable Company brought replevin in the county court of Tulsa county for possession of one piano, the possession of which was alleged to be wrongfully held by defendant, A. L. Chase. The parties will be designated in accordance with their respective -titles in the- trial court.
Plaintiff claimed possession of said piano by virtue of a chattel mortgage alleged to have been executed by defendant. Defendant filed answer denying the execution of the mortgage and alleged same had been forged. Trial' to a jury resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff for possession of the piano or its value…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chickasaw Compress Co. v. BowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. NewburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Frick Co. v. OatsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Chickasha St. Ry. Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Strahorn-Hutton-Evans Commission Co. v. FlorerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Paramount Publix Corp. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Hope Natural Gas Co. v. Ideal Gasoline Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Sharum v. SharumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. NeeleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Mullinix Construction Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.