Legal Opinion

Hill v. Pierson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1895No. 6329PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Douglas county. Heard below before Ferguson, Ji

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

June 9, 1893, the plaintiff commenced an action in the •district court of Douglas county, in which the petition filed, or the portion we need notice, read as follows:

“The plaintiff for cause of action states:
“1. That on or about the 17th day of December, A. D. 1892, one Frank A. Kemp was the absolute owner in fee-simple of the following described property in Douglas •county, Nebraska, to-wit: The west twenty-two feet of the east one-half of lot 4, in block 120, in the original city -of Omaha, county and state aforesaid, said property being ¿known as No. 1321 Douglas street, in said city; and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barton v. Union Cattle Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Farrell v. CookNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Shed v. HawthorneNebraska Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Spire v. Strawberries, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Schroder v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State of Texas v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Widmer v. FrettiOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Bowden v. NugentArizona Supreme Court · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API