Legal Opinion

Bowden v. Nugent

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1924No. Criminal No. 572PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

— This proceeding was brought for the purpose of determining whether a person charged with violating a city ordinance is, under the Constitution and laws of this state, entitled to a jury trial. Like all cases it must be determined upon its own peculiar facts, and will not be a precedent except in cases where the essential facts are the same.

The appellee was tried and convicted in the police court of the city of Douglas, a jury having been denied him. He defaulted in the payment of fine, and was committed to the city jail and the custody of appellant, the chief of police of said city. He…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Rassmussen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. J. B. Mullen & Co. v. MoseleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Brown v. GreerArizona Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Derendal v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Benitez v. DunevantArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Urs v. Maricopa County Attorney's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API