Legal Opinion

City of Cushing v. Buckles

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1928No. 17564PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENNETT, C.

The city of Cushing required certain lands upon which to 'erect a reservoir for its waterworks, and this suit was filed by the city to condemn for that purpose about 50 odd acres of land belonging to Mrs. Rosa M. Buckles and Harry Buckles, defendants. The - land is described in detail in the petition by proper metes and bounds. Soon thereafter an answer was filed and commissioners were appointed to make appraisement. The report of their proceedings shows that on January 13, 1925, they appraised the land taken at $4,630. and the damages -to the remaining part of the tract at…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. United States v. GrizzardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. L. R. Junction Ry. v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation Dist. v. CostelloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Kelly v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Wilkerson v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Western Farmers Electric Cooperative v. YatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API