Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Qutub
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 18, 1985No. 64,141-A, CA A30791 [control] 73,204, CA A30792PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
In this Consolidated appeal the state appeals from orders of the juvenile court that suppressed marijuana and other evidence that the police seized in several searches. ORS 419.561(6)(c). The police entered the residence of Stephen Hill and arrested him pursuant to an arrest warrant. They searched the house without a search warrant because they believed other people were there who might help Hill escape. In that search the police did not see other people but did see marijuana and other incriminating evidence in plain view. They then photographed, but did not seize, the evidence. About two…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CockeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Thai/SchmollingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.