Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Thai/Schmolling
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 27, 1995No. J94-0299; CA A86085PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Child appeals from an order finding him within the juvenile court’s jurisdiction for conduct which, if committed by an adult, would constitute sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.427. Child assigns as error the denial of his motion to suppress incriminating statements. We review a juvenile court’s suppression ruling de novo, giving some deference to credibility determinations. ORS 419A.200(5); ORS 19.125(3); State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Fikes, 116 Or App 618, 620, 624, 842 P2d 807 (1992); State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Qutub, 75 Or App 298, 300, 706 P2d 962, rev den 300 Or 332 (1985). We…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. WirkkalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Rieman v. SwopeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.