Legal Opinion

County of Alameda v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1997No. H014078PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHARA, J.

In 1971, the California Legislature enacted Public Utilities Code 1 section 6201.5 which, for the first time, authorized counties to use the franchise-granting provisions of the Franchise Act of 1937. In this case we hold the enactment did not change the franchise fee formula contained in preexisting county franchises granted under the Broughton Act.

Statutory Background

Prior to 1937, the Broughton Act, enacted in 1905 and codified in chapter 1 of division 3 of the Public Utilities Code, sections 6001-6092, was the only statutory scheme for counties and most cities of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Simi Corporation v. GaramendiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. City of Santa Cruz v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. San Francisco Human Services Agency v. Felicia C.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Bisno v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API